.
Feedback

Windsor Locks and East Windsor Reimbursed for October Storm Costs

The two communities spent nearly $1.7 million combined for their after storm cleanups.

 

Within the last month, Windsor Locks and East Windsor officials have found out that their communities will be reimbursed for most of their clean up costs from the October 2011 storm.

Windsor Locks is receiving $1.3 million and East Windsor is receiving $186,762 from the federal government.

The Federal Emergency Management Administration is reimbursing Windsor Locks 75 percent or $1,176,630 and the Federal Highway Administration is adding $113,505, officials said in September.


“That helped us a great deal,” Victor Puia, Windsor Locks director of emergency management, said. “That’s a lot of money.”

East Windsor First Selectwoman Denise Menard said the town’s net cost for the clean up was $63,254.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

East Windsor Residents voted to allow spending up to $70,000 of the town’s money for the clean up. Town officials used local companies to haul away and dispose of the debris.

Windsor Locks residents approved spending $1.4 million to remove all of the debris with the understanding that FEMA would reimburse 75 percent of the cost. The town originally allocated $1 million for debris removal, then an additional $400,000 in December 2011.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Locks-East Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
MAC May 24, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Maria, your dismissive and divisive 'analysis' ignores the fact that POTUS is anRead More "executive" position, also "Commander-in-Chief" of the military! O had exactly ZERO "executive" experience, which--along with his anti-business and anti-America views--explains his failures. Mr. Morici's assessment of O's job performance is perfectly pragmatic and relevant, while your doting worship of the "Agitator-in-Chief" is rather pathetic, as well as being irrelevant.
Maria Giannuzzi May 24, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The author of the article quoted endlessly above is Peter Morici, a Professor of InternationalRead More Business at the University of Maryland. I suppose he is to be forgiven if he sees everything through a business lens, after all it has given him a very comfortable livelihood for decades. But it is still a faulty lens on this topic and he should know better.
Maria Giannuzzi May 24, 2013 at 12:18 pm
The CEO analogy is really dumb. Didn't CEO Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan Chase preside over aRead More multi-billion dollar trading loss last year. Didn't a lot of so-called "good" CEOs look the other way while collecting huge bonuses as their banks became insolvent because of unethical and unwise (and possibly illegal) investments in high-risk securities. These truly were management failures that devastated the U.S. economy But the CEO analogy is understandable given that Mr. Morici and his supporters are so enthralled by the corporate state.