.

East Windsor Board of Finance Pares Proposed Budget to $34.1 mllion

The proposal would mean a 2.68 percent increase over the current budget. Voters on Tuesday rejected the first proposal, which was a 3.58 percent increase.

 

After struggling to find places to make reductions, the East Windsor Board of Finance Thursday approved a $34.138 million 2012-13 budget to present to voters at a second referendum.

The budget represents a 2.68 percent increase over the current $33.247 million spending plan. The proposal would mean a 0.56 mill increase in the tax rate, officials said. The second budget referendum will be on May 22.

Voters on Tuesday the board’s first proposed $34.438 million budget by a 2 to 1 margin.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.


Board Chairman Jason Bowsza said he and the rest of the board don’t look at the No votes as malicious votes.

“There are people in this town who can’t afford it and we recognize that,” Bowsza said. “We’re looking at it as, if you oppose what we put forward that just means we have to work harder.”

In order to pare the budget, board members decided to reduce the board of education budget by $170,000 and cut funding for an emergency generator at .

Board Secretary Joseph Pellegrini said the board has to concerned with the people who came out to vote down the proposed budget on Tuesday.

“None of us sitting at this table are overjoyed at making cuts,” Pellegrini said.

Selectman Alan Baker proposed cutting the funding for the generator saying the amount would leave a lot of other things whole in the budget. Baker said the proposal for the generator is to address something that may be a need, while other portions of the budget are needs.

Selectwoman Dale Nelson objected to cutting out the generator saying it allow the high school to be a place during an emergency where food can be cooked, people can take showers and have a place to stay.

“This is something we have to do,” Nelson said. “We have to give the citizens a place to go in an emergency.”

Board Member Donnelle Godeck said the public voted against the budget.

“The town can’t have it if you don’t have the money,” Godeck said.

At a public hearing before the board’s budget workshop, residents gave varied opinions about why the budget was rejected and the town should proceed.

Josh Kapelner, a Brookwell Court resident and economic development commission member, said he was greatly concerned that the residents were presented with an unrealistic budget that board members hoped no one would notice or care about.

Kapelner said for instance when the board of education proposed a 6.5 percent increase, board of finance members should have said they would like nothing more to do that but the  residents and businesses can’t afford it.

Richard Morrison, a Willow Circle resident, said the voters don’t get enough information about what the town is doing. He said elderly residents are concerned about tax increases.

“You want input,” Morrison said. “Tell department heads to bring in a 3 percent decrease from what they had.”

Sharon Muska, an East Road resident, said the only avenue residents have to get elected officials attention about the government is to deny them funds. Muska said feels the voting hours (noon to 8 p.m.) may have disenfranchised people who couldn’t make those times.

Charlie Madison, a Main Street resident, said he was trying to figure out why the budget was voted down. He said 3.5 percent was not a big increase and that people will pay that kind of increase at the gas pum.

Madison said that amount is not enough to cover everything the town needs.

 
Anti Taxes May 12, 2012 at 03:06 AM
It is primarily a board of Democrats. Tax increases is what they are all about. I will vote NO again on the budget. Let's leave the mill rate the same as it was last year AND do something to cut the over 40% increase for town employees insurance and benefits. That is just ridiculous. They earn a reasonable wage, let them absorb some of the costs. If healthcare is going up, we can blame that on Obama (a democrat).
Dan Starvish May 14, 2012 at 03:01 AM
Ms Nelson, I see you are very concerned about a generator. Any plans to have one installed for the ambulance building? Or what about town hall? Maybe the new one at town hall can be moved to the high school?
Alan Baker May 14, 2012 at 12:44 PM
It's really too bad that so few people took the many opportunites offered to learn what the budget was all about, and that only 11% of our citizens took a few minutes out of their day to vote for it. The budget presented was the best budget East Windsor will see this year. I felt it is was a responsible, fiscally sound budget that would have moved East Windsor forward. It had unanimous backing from both the Board of Selectmen and the Board of Finance, who put many hours into primarily cutting whatever we felt could be responsibly cut. People really need to take time to educate themselves about the budget, and then get out and VOTE!
Dan Starvish May 14, 2012 at 01:19 PM
Al, I was unfortunately unable to vote. Due to the time it was set, 12-8pm, I was at work through out all the hours. I had planned on voting before I went to work, but realized the night before I wouldnt of been able too. I think both boards should really look at why people are voting no, and actually put some heart into comments in the paper. Some people I have talked too were a little amazed that leaders were quoted in the paper saying they were shocked. I wasnt shocked it failed, I was shocked that we managed over 1,000 votes on an 8 hour referendum. 11% of total population may have voted, but sounds like like 15-20% of registered voters no? How many are registered to vote in town?
Blink May 15, 2012 at 02:31 PM
How many of you have actually looked at your budget to see what's in it. The democrats will hand you the "Pelozi Challenge" to pass the budget so you know what's in it. Your leaders are ignoring a good part of the voting population. Your older residents. They don't have computers and many of them cannot make your meetings. From what they tell me they are still upset over the $10,000 raise for Public Works Director, Leonard Norton. They aren't too happy with Denise Menard either......"I kind of did it while Lenny was doing it," Menard said of her request for a raise at a Nov. 7 executive session during which a personnel matter was discussed with Norton." How about Catherine Cabral, Becky MacDonald and Robin Newton. The Democrats prefer to sweep these things under the carpet and move on. Tax and Spend. That's their answer. By the way what's with the noon to 8 p.m. voting window? Sounds suspect. Are you trying to ignore the over-taxed that actually get up at 5 a.m. to go to work?
Anti Taxes May 15, 2012 at 11:44 PM
Alan - I am in the nicest neighborhood in town, $10,000 + a year for property taxes is minimum for any 5 of us on this street therefore the increased mill rate was not satisfying to me. Secondly, 40+ % increase for town employees benefits and insurance is absurd,. That needs further trimming. I am prepared to vote no AGAIN.
Alan Baker May 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM
I'm sorry "Blink", I will not debate any "masked crusaders". I am willing to stand up and be accountable for what I say here and I expect the same from everyone else.Thank you for your comments though.
Alan Baker May 16, 2012 at 12:05 PM
I'm sorry "Anti Taxes", I will not debate any "masked crusaders". I am willing to stand up and be accountable for what I say here and I expect the same from everyone else.Thank you for your comments though.
Anti Taxes May 16, 2012 at 01:32 PM
Well technically you were debating us, basically saying we didn't educate ourselves about the budget and what is in it. Sorry, republicans see the budget as ridiculous. In addition, the revisions to the budget are still ridiculous. Trimming only $300,000 worth of fat from it (including a generator which shouldn't have been cut) is ludicrous to me. I will be voting no again. No biggie.
Blink May 16, 2012 at 01:32 PM
Alan. I only identify myself when writing editorials for large newspapers. I am not a politician and know how to protect myself while being honest and truthful. So unless you are a stalker you would understand that.
Blink May 16, 2012 at 01:34 PM
Anti....Alan has no answers. He thinks he's talking to the "Avengers"
Blink May 16, 2012 at 01:41 PM
Messages are being deleted from this board. Alan Baker can say whatever he wants.
Blink May 16, 2012 at 01:42 PM
change of heart?
Frances Neill May 16, 2012 at 02:08 PM
I took the time to attend the last board of finance meeting and ask a few questions. I too questioned that increase in employee benefits and insurance and found out that it is legally necessary as a result of unfortunate and uncontrollable circumstances. Our first selectman was extremely helpful and open, answering any and all questions I had about particulars in the budget. After I spoke with her, I feel comfortable with the budget they had proposed. I urge you to call her and ask all your questions. The answers I received were forthright and informative. Please don't vote no again until you find out the particulars.
Anti Taxes May 16, 2012 at 02:11 PM
Hi Frances - " unfortunate and uncontrollable circumstances". DId they elaborate more than that? While the benefits and insurance category isn't the biggest as far as money goes, that 42% increase stuck out like a sore thumb. I could even overlook that if the mil rate just stays the same as it is this year. If they can do that, I wil vote yes.
Alan Baker May 17, 2012 at 11:56 AM
Dan, Voting hours for the referendum are set by state statute. After receiving many complaints it was looked into and we found that the board of selectmen could vote to change them. Unfortunately due to public notice requirements, there was not enough time to change it for the next budget referendum anyway, which is Tuesday, May 22. You can vote by absentee ballot though, you just need to go to the town clerk and pick one up. Hope that helps for the next referendum. Here's a link to instructions on how to obtain and cast an absentee ballot. http://www.eastwindsorct.com/Public_Documents/EWindsorCT_Clerk/S018B8077-018B80AF.0/May%2022,%202012%20Budget%20Referendum%20Absentee%20Ballot%20Information.pdf Here's a link to the latest proposed budget: http://www.eastwindsorct.com/Public_Documents/EWindsorCT_Financial/052212ReferendumBudget1.pdf
Dan Starvish May 22, 2012 at 04:23 PM
Al, town leaders never should of let the budget hours change. The change happened a few years ago, in the dark, to attempt to pass a budget behind the voters backs. This was before you were in office. Also, can you link me the state statute on the budget referendum times? I cant find it. I am voting no until all public safety agencies are properly funded.
Alan Baker May 22, 2012 at 04:31 PM
I had a paper copy which I have already recycled. I'll try to get another copy for you, or a link. I'm not sure how shortened hours guarantees a win or a loss on a budget vote. I would think the effect would vary from year to year. To me the shorter hours certainly means less votes, which quite possibly doomed the first budget vote, and gave us less of an idea on what people are feeling, besides general apathy.
Dan Starvish May 22, 2012 at 04:38 PM
When the hours were changed, the vote also moved to a Saturday that year. There is no reason, short of law, to not have our voting hours consistant with every other vote we hold at the polls. I am eager to see this statute, but really, because it can be over ridden, it should of been anyway. This shortened hours was not always the case, and I cant even find a news article for another CT town advertising a 12-8 vote on a budget. I can find plenty citing 6am-8pm though. I mean, I am sure there must be someone out there, but I cant find it. The clear majority is 6am-8pm http://www.theday.com/article/20120515/NWS01/120519778/-1/Zip06&town=Madison&template=NWS01zip06art http://eastgranbyct.org/new-town-meeting-and-budget-referendum-called-for-by-the-east-granby-board-of-selectman.html http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x1035958238/Lisbon-budget-referendum-scheduled-for-today#axzz1vcKC6SPa http://clinton.patch.com/articles/town-budget-referendum-vote-tomorrow
Blink May 23, 2012 at 05:36 PM
Polling times (All States): Polls open 6 a.m. local time and close 8 p.m. local time. (CT. General Statutes 9-174).

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »