.
Feedback

Kennedy Relative Michael Skakel Denied Parole in Moxley Murder

Ethel Kennedy's nephew was convicted in 2002 of murdering Martha Moxley in 1975.

 

Michael Skakel, a member of the famous Kennedy family who is serving 20 years to life in prison after being convicted of murder, was denied parole at a hearing Wednesday morning.

The three-member Board of Pardons & Paroles questioned Skakel for just under two hours in the hearing at MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution in Suffield, CT, where he is serving his sentence.

Skakel, 52, is the nephew of the late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's widow, Ethel (Skakel) Kennedy. He was convicted in 2002 of killing 15-year-old Martha Moxley with a golf club in Greenwich, CT in 1975.

After nearly a quarter-century, Skakel was indicted for the murder in June 2000. A highly-publicized trial resulted in his conviction on June 7, 2002; during his sentencing hearing, pleas for leniency from Ethel Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. were read, citing childhood neglect and abuse from his father, Rushton Skakel, as well as dyslexia.

Skakel has steadfastly proclaimed his innocence since his arrest, and did so again Wednesday.

"Almost 37 years ago today, Martha was tragically murdered," he said. "The best chance of getting parole would be to admit this crime - but I did not commit this crime."

Skakel referred numerous times to his commitment to sobriety, which he says came on Oct. 25, 1982. 

"As a recovering man, I cannot bear false witness aginst myself, but I pray every day that whoever did this crime comes to justice," he said. "Tomorrow marks my 30th year of sobriety - how can a guilty man stay sober that long with that kind of guilt on their mind?"

Skakel spoke about his son, who is now 13 years old.

"Every day I'm praying to God that I can get home to my boy," he said. "He's proved to me that God does exist. I had the first three years of his life to be with him, and it was unbelievable."

Four members of Moxley's family spoke in favor of Skakel's continued incarceration.

"I believe Michael is representative of the most dangerous aspects of our society," said John Moxley, Martha's brother. "Michael should be incarcerated for the balance of his life."

Moxley's mother, Dorthy, said she sympathized with Skakel for his dyslexia, but that he should not use that as an excuse for what he has been convicted of doing.

"I have sympathy for Michael, because I am also dyslexic, but it never drove me to do the things he's done," she said. "Martha, my baby, will never have a life. To lose a child is the worst thing in the world. I pray nothing happens to your child. He should serve his 20 years, and then maybe he'll do something wonderful."

The panel deliberated for 45 minutes before returning with the decision to deny parole to Skakel.

"Your release is incompatible with the welfare of society," parole board chair Erika Tindill said. Skakel bowed his head, then turned to a group of 10 family members and supporters behind him and patted his heart before being led back to his cell.

Skakel is eligible to apply for parole again in Oct. 2017.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Locks-East Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
MAC May 24, 2013 at 01:23 pm
Maria, your dismissive and divisive 'analysis' ignores the fact that POTUS is anRead More "executive" position, also "Commander-in-Chief" of the military! O had exactly ZERO "executive" experience, which--along with his anti-business and anti-America views--explains his failures. Mr. Morici's assessment of O's job performance is perfectly pragmatic and relevant, while your doting worship of the "Agitator-in-Chief" is rather pathetic, as well as being irrelevant.
Maria Giannuzzi May 24, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The author of the article quoted endlessly above is Peter Morici, a Professor of InternationalRead More Business at the University of Maryland. I suppose he is to be forgiven if he sees everything through a business lens, after all it has given him a very comfortable livelihood for decades. But it is still a faulty lens on this topic and he should know better.
Maria Giannuzzi May 24, 2013 at 12:18 pm
The CEO analogy is really dumb. Didn't CEO Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan Chase preside over aRead More multi-billion dollar trading loss last year. Didn't a lot of so-called "good" CEOs look the other way while collecting huge bonuses as their banks became insolvent because of unethical and unwise (and possibly illegal) investments in high-risk securities. These truly were management failures that devastated the U.S. economy But the CEO analogy is understandable given that Mr. Morici and his supporters are so enthralled by the corporate state.